Bill Morris: January 2011

New foreclosure ruling ... What a mess!

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled on Friday that two large mortgage firms had foreclosed on homes without sufficient proof that they had the right to foreclose:

Court rules against banks in pivotal mortgage case

Picture yourself in this situation:

  • You purchased a home months ago, moved, enrolled the kids in school, faithfully made your mortgage payments and went happily on with your life. 
  • Oh, yes, the house you bought was being sold by a mortgage servicer who took possession through foreclosure.
  • One day your life is interrupted by a notification that the bank you bought your home from may not have had the right to sell it to you because they never actually owned it themselves.
  • It turns out that the foreclosed mortgage had been sold, maybe more than once, eventually landing on the books of the bank that sold you your house.  Probably, that loan was "securitized," i.e., packaged with many other loans and marketed as part of a "mortgage-backed security."  The problem is that somewhere along the way, the actual ownership of the loan was muddied so regardless who the mortgagor was supposed to be sending payments to, it became unclear which lender really had the legal right to take action in the event of default.
  • Now, if you don't really own your house, who does?  And what happens to the money you sent to the lender who holds your mortgage note?  Could a court decide that you have no right to live there?  Will the company that issued your title insurance policy provide the legal assistance you require?  Will they cover any loss you experience?
  • Assume the title company, in its effort to protect you and avoid paying a very costly title claim, sues the lender who previously foreclosed and sold the house to you.  What if that bank claims that it was misled about the quality of the mortgage loans it invested in, and another lender or two are called to account.  What if a court at some point rules that the previous owner should be able to take back the property?  How long could this take to resolve?  What would you do?

Conceivably, that's where mortgage foreclosure litigation is headed.  This is not about the "robo-signers" we heard so much about a few months ago.  Some cases may involve actual fraud; more likely most will come down to dotting i's and crossing t's.  In every case, there may be a completely innocent homebuyer caught in the middle.  With rare exceptions, the previous mortgagor was actually in default so foreclosure was an appropriate step.  The question is:  Who had the legal right to do so?

The lesson?  Proceed with caution when buying foreclosed properties.  Major mortgage lenders stopped foreclosures entirely late last year in order to review their portfolios and confirm their ownership.  That should mean that the process is handled better now and in the future than it was over the past couple of years.  I don't usually find that foreclosed properties are great bargains anyway, but for the right buyer and the right property this risk may be acceptable.  For many or most owner-occupants, though, this is well worth thinking about.

Bill F. Morris, ABR, CRS, CDPE, e-PRO, MBA
RE/MAX Capital City
Call or Text:       512-785-3345
Toll-Free:           1-800-692-8784, x 162
Email:                 
bmorris@remax.net
Web:                   www.eHomesByMorris.com  

Your personal referrals are the best measure of my success!

Comment balloon 0 commentsBill Morris • January 08 2011 09:54PM
New foreclosure ruling.. What a mess!
share
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled on Friday that two large mortgage firms had foreclosed on homes without sufficient proof that they had the right to foreclose : Court rules against banks in pivotal mortgage case Picture… more
Austin growing jobs.. in the news
share
CBS Evening News with Katie Couric featured Austin on Friday, January 7. In case you missed it, click here This is really a good feature about the state of employment and unemployment in the United States. The segments before and after the… more
Texas Brokerage Services - whose side is "your" agent on?
share
So.. you saw a sign last weekend and called the agent's number.. and now he's driving you to see a couple of houses. Is he really your agent? Not unless you took steps to formalize the relationship -- i. e., to hire him. Since… more
Job growth in Austin
share
I haven't tried to reconcile the different rankings in these reports, but they're both great news: Austin, Texas Leads the Nation in Job Growth Austin 3rd best job market in U. S., Forbes says There is an entrepreneurial ethic in… more
Does the Thought of Working With a Realtor Make You Cringe?
share
A fun post and great advice. Over the past few years, the real estate business has gotten more and more complicated. With more ways to be surprised than ever, why would you go it alone? Does the Thought of Working With a Realtor Make You Cringe? &… more
Austin on CBS Evening News -- Friday 1/7/2011
share
Over the past year or so I have posted many articles featuring Austin at or near the top of various rankings among U. S. cities. The trend has caught national attention. Tune in at 5:30 PM on Friday, January 7: Chamber, Austin to be Featured… more
Texas still attractive for relocation
share
For the sixth consecutive year, Allied Van Lines reports that Texas enjoyed the highest level of net in-migration in the United States Especially in Austin, there are a lot of folks who view this as a mixed blessing -- the growth, employment, and… more